That said, to build up a training program is definitely more work with Xert, I would not use the recommended workouts, for me the system only suggests very few workouts which get boring quickly and the Xert app was having issues with my Tacx neo bike. Xert is great for tracking your fitness, I agree with what others have said MAP is great and the ability to go for breakthroughs using their system is really nice (and quite accurate for me, compared to other methods).
I find that they're really for different purposes. Whatever you choose, keep in mind that off the bike exercises are crucial for your health and results.
If your day job is not cycling, and time does not abound, then it's a great tool.
I lost track of the amount of books and time i used to use to plan my seasons before i started using Trainerroad. Pricewise is not the end of the world, i pay €19 per month, but really the only thing i have to do is climb on my trainer/bike and pedal, it does all the math and planning for me. At the same time this gives you some mental endurance, usefull later on longer days out on the saddle. And if you don't "cheat" your schedule or goals too much you see palpable results, on your numbers and most of all on the road.īe aware it's somewhat monotonous, it will not hurt to have a second screen (or a big one you can split) with an easy to follow documentary or soap opera to help pass the session, i listen to music sometimes. I am very happy with Trainerroad, you can adapt it to your available time, to your perceived speciality or preference (climber, sprinter.) or even discipline, Triathlon, MTB, road. Summary: when I used trainerroad it was good but required a more structured approach which is why I like the flexibility of xert because I'm able to use it based on the day I'm riding (especially now that I have 2 kids!! haha)ĮDIT: I just wanted to add that Xert's KOM Hunter is a cool way to attack segments! Xert then recalculates my fitness curve and it is harder to have a breakthrough next time. So, when I'm feeling good I go find a hilly route, ride above threshold to bring MAP down, and when it gets low enough I essentially attack myself to push my watts above MAP. This can be done indoors or outdoors which is cool. As you ride above threshold it brings the MAP number down and if you are able to push your watts above MAP it is considered a breakthough and your fitness curve/FTP is recalculated. The parts of Xert that I really like that keeps me around is the auto-claculated FTP and MAP - especially the MAP Garmin data field.Įssentially MAP represents the theoretical amount of power you have available to you. I like the workouts but find the workout advisor pushes a lot of sweet spot though their articles seem to talk about polarized a lot. It is far more flexible but has a fairly steep learning curve.
#Trainerroad forum software
I signed up more out of curiousity about the software and theory behind it. So, it didn't really work for me given my time constraints but I found the software easy to use, the workouts were pretty standard, and I did see some improvement while I used it.
In addition, I didn't want to waste time doing FTP tests instead of riding. TrainerRoad was well structured but I had just had my first son and was unable to follow the structure as rigidly. I used TrainerRoad for a period about 2 years ago and currently use Xert.
0 kommentar(er)
